You seem to be using an older version of Internet Explorer. This site requires Internet Explorer 8 or higher. Update your browser here today to fully enjoy all the marvels of this site.
Wait... Is guy in the U.S? Because if he was he would not need to cover his face.
If he is trying to express himself in a country without freedom of expression, and one that opposes terrorism, then he would have to cover his face.
Alternatively, If he is trying to express himself in a country without freedom of expression, and one that endorses terrorism, then he would not have to cover his face.
Therefor there are only four, no five, conclusions.
1.He is in a country that does have freedom of expression and that opposes terrorism, in which case he is a knucklehead for covering his face.
1.He is in a country that does not have freedom of expression and that opposes terrorism, in which case he is a knucklehead because he is arguing against himself.
2. 1.He is in a country that does have freedom of expression and he is so ugly that covering his face is normal.
3. He translated his thoughts backwards. He meant to say terrorism is freedom of expression.
If he is trying to express himself in a country without freedom of expression, and one that opposes terrorism, then he would have to cover his face.
Alternatively, If he is trying to express himself in a country without ...